FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8927013
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Rodgers v. Watt

No. 8927013 · Decided May 13, 1983
No. 8927013 · Ninth Circuit · 1983 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 13, 1983
Citation
No. 8927013
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER FOR PUBLICATION Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is hereby withdrawn.
Plain English Summary
ORDER FOR PUBLICATION Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appe
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER FOR PUBLICATION Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appe
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rodgers v. Watt in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 13, 1983.
Use the citation No. 8927013 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →