Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646398
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Roberts v. Kent
No. 8646398 · Decided December 21, 2007
No. 8646398·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 21, 2007
Citation
No. 8646398
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** In light of appellant’s payment of the docketing fee, the motion to file the opening brief as served is granted. The Clerk shall file the opening brief received March 27, 2007, the answering brief received April 24, 2007, and the reply brief received May 24, 2007. A review of the record, the response to the court’s August 27, 2007 order to show cause, and the opening and answering briefs indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** In light of appellant’s payment of the docketing fee, the motion to file the opening brief as served is granted.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** In light of appellant’s payment of the docketing fee, the motion to file the opening brief as served is granted.
02The Clerk shall file the opening brief received March 27, 2007, the answering brief received April 24, 2007, and the reply brief received May 24, 2007.
03A review of the record, the response to the court’s August 27, 2007 order to show cause, and the opening and answering briefs indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.