Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8669913
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Rios v. Mukasey
No. 8669913 · Decided April 29, 2008
No. 8669913·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 29, 2008
Citation
No. 8669913
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Angelica Ortiz Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Review’s denial of her motion to reconsider its denial of her underlying application for cancellation of removal, based on petitioner’s failure to establish extreme hardship to *730 her qualifying United States citizen daughter. Petitioner failed to file a timely petition for review of the underlying order of removal, and we, therefore, consider only the BIA’s denial of the motion to reconsider. Petitioner contends that the immigration judge and BIA erred in finding that she failed to establish extreme hardship, but she fails to raise any challenge with respect to the BIA’s denial of her motion to reconsider. Petitioner, therefore, has waived any challenge to the BIA’s order denying reconsideration. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Angelica Ortiz Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Review’s denial of her motion to reconsider its denial of her underlying application for cancellation of remova
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Maria Angelica Ortiz Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Review’s denial of her motion to reconsider its denial of her underlying application for cancellation of remova
02Petitioner failed to file a timely petition for review of the underlying order of removal, and we, therefore, consider only the BIA’s denial of the motion to reconsider.
03Petitioner contends that the immigration judge and BIA erred in finding that she failed to establish extreme hardship, but she fails to raise any challenge with respect to the BIA’s denial of her motion to reconsider.
04Petitioner, therefore, has waived any challenge to the BIA’s order denying reconsideration.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Angelica Ortiz Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Review’s denial of her motion to reconsider its denial of her underlying application for cancellation of remova
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rios v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 29, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8669913 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.