FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9453074
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Rickey Reed v. City of Culver City

No. 9453074 · Decided December 18, 2023
No. 9453074 · Ninth Circuit · 2023 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 18, 2023
Citation
No. 9453074
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICKEY B. REED, No. 22-56099 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-10526-JAK-RAO v. MEMORANDUM* CITY OF CULVER CITY, Defendant-Appellee, and MEGHAN SAHLI WELLS; et al., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 12, 2023** Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges Rickey B. Reed appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for Culver City in his federal and state law employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Freyd v. Univ. of Or., 990 F.3d 1211, 1219 (9th Cir. 2021). We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment because Reed failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he was qualified for the position, or whether the proffered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for failing to hire Reed was pretextual. See Freyd, 990 F.3d at 1228 (discussing burden- shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)); Merrick v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc., 867 F.3d 1139, 1145 (9th Cir. 2017) (analyzing state claims of discrimination under same framework as federal claims); Dickson v. Burke Williams, Inc., 184 Cal. Rptr. 3d 774, 781, 783 (Ct. App. 2015) (explaining that an actionable claim for failure to prevent discrimination requires an actionable claim of discrimination). We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED. 2 22-56099
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rickey Reed v. City of Culver City in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 18, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9453074 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →