Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628455
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Richardo v. Federal Deposit Insurance
No. 8628455 · Decided February 15, 2007
No. 8628455·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 15, 2007
Citation
No. 8628455
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** At oral argument, plaintiffs’ counsel represented that his clients no longer own any bank stock. As such, all claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are moot. See Jones Intercable of San Diego, Inc. v. City of Chula Vista, 80 F.3d 320, 328 (9th Cir.1996). Plaintiffs’ remaining claim for damages arising out of a due process violation is barred by FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471 , 114 S.Ct. 996 , 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994), which held that a Bivens action cannot be brought against a federal agency. Id. at 484-85 , 114 S.Ct. 996 . *678 DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** At oral argument, plaintiffs’ counsel represented that his clients no longer own any bank stock.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** At oral argument, plaintiffs’ counsel represented that his clients no longer own any bank stock.
02As such, all claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are moot.
03Plaintiffs’ remaining claim for damages arising out of a due process violation is barred by FDIC v.
04996 , 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994), which held that a Bivens action cannot be brought against a federal agency.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** At oral argument, plaintiffs’ counsel represented that his clients no longer own any bank stock.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Richardo v. Federal Deposit Insurance in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 15, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628455 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.