Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623310
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Rice v. Pliler
No. 8623310 · Decided July 27, 2006
No. 8623310·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 27, 2006
Citation
No. 8623310
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Because the record reasonably indicates that Rice was not incompetent during his criminal proceedings in state court, the California Court of Appeal decision holding that there was “no showing” by Rice of mental incompetence was not objectively unreasonable. See Pham v. Terhune, 400 F.3d 740, 742 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam); see also Taylor v. Maddox, 366 F.3d 992, 999 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1038 , 125 S.Ct. 809 , 160 L.Ed.2d 605 *653 (2004). Accordingly, Rice is not entitled to habeas relief on his procedural and substantive due process claims. See Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 603-06, 608-09 (9th Cir.2004), as amended. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Because the record reasonably indicates that Rice was not incompetent during his criminal proceedings in state court, the California Court of Appeal decision holding that there was “no showing” by Rice of mental incompetence w
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Because the record reasonably indicates that Rice was not incompetent during his criminal proceedings in state court, the California Court of Appeal decision holding that there was “no showing” by Rice of mental incompetence w
02Terhune, 400 F.3d 740, 742 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam); see also Taylor v.
03Accordingly, Rice is not entitled to habeas relief on his procedural and substantive due process claims.
04Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 603-06, 608-09 (9th Cir.2004), as amended.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Because the record reasonably indicates that Rice was not incompetent during his criminal proceedings in state court, the California Court of Appeal decision holding that there was “no showing” by Rice of mental incompetence w
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rice v. Pliler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 27, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623310 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.