FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689220
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Ricardo v. Mukasey

No. 8689220 · Decided September 12, 2008
No. 8689220 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 12, 2008
Citation
No. 8689220
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Nehemias Edmundo Ramirez Ricardo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his second motion to reopen as numerically barred. In the motion to reopen, petitioner sought to apply for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) following the underlying denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petition for review. Petitioner contends that the numerical bar to his motion to reopen should not prevent consideration of his motion be *473 cause he established an exception to the bar by demonstrating that there are changed country conditions in Guatemala giving rise to his prima facie eligibility for relief under CAT. The BIA acted within its discretion in concluding that petitioner’s second motion to reopen was numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c). Petitioner failed to demonstrate changed country conditions to establish an exception to that bar. See Konstantinova v. INS, 195 F.3d 528, 530 (9th Cir.1999). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Nehemias Edmundo Ramirez Ricardo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his second motion to reopen as numerically barred.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Nehemias Edmundo Ramirez Ricardo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his second motion to reopen as numerically barred.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ricardo v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 12, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689220 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →