FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8820722
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Rialto Irr. Dist. v. Chellis

No. 8820722 · Decided October 16, 1917
No. 8820722 · Ninth Circuit · 1917 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 16, 1917
Citation
No. 8820722
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, filed October 6, 1914, in the causes entitled in this court Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, v. N. W. Stowell, and N. W. Stowell v. Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, No. 2491, 246 Fed. 294 , - C. C. A.-, and Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, v. Burt Chellis, and Burt Chellis v. Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, Nos. 2492 and 2493. and upon the authority of Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. N. W. Stowell, Defendant in Error, and N. W. Stowell, Plaintiff in Error, v. Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, No. 2491, 246 Eed. 294, — C. C. A. -, just decided, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Southern Division, in each of the causes Nos. 2492 and 2493 be and hereby is reversed, and the causes remanded to the said District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed in the opinion of this court in case No. 2491.
Plain English Summary
Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, filed October 6, 1914, in the causes entitled in this court Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, v.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, filed October 6, 1914, in the causes entitled in this court Rialto Irrigation District, a Corporation, v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rialto Irr. Dist. v. Chellis in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 16, 1917.
Use the citation No. 8820722 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →