Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8688749
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Rhodes v. Stanislaus County
No. 8688749 · Decided August 28, 2008
No. 8688749·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 28, 2008
Citation
No. 8688749
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*981 MEMORANDUM ** On July 24, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations of August 8, 2007, 2007 WL 2254409 . A review of appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause and the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*981 MEMORANDUM ** On July 24, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations of August
Key Points
01*981 MEMORANDUM ** On July 24, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations of August
02A review of appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause and the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
04Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
*981 MEMORANDUM ** On July 24, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations of August
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rhodes v. Stanislaus County in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 28, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8688749 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.