Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Reynoso de Velasco v. Gonzales
No. 8626660 · Decided December 8, 2006
No. 8626660·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 8, 2006
Citation
No. 8626660
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Reynoso de Velasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss. We lack jurisdiction to consider Reynoso de Velasco’s challenge to the agency’s discretionary determination that she failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005). Moreover, Reynoso de Velasco has failed to raise a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Reynoso de Velasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Reynoso de Velasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to consider Reynoso de Velasco’s challenge to the agency’s discretionary determination that she failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her qualifying relatives.
03Moreover, Reynoso de Velasco has failed to raise a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Reynoso de Velasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Reynoso de Velasco v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 8, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626660 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.