FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8896328
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Reinoehl v. Hershey

No. 8896328 · Decided May 8, 1970
No. 8896328 · Ninth Circuit · 1970 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 8, 1970
Citation
No. 8896328
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to have declared invalid Selective Service System Regulation 32 C.F.R. § 1606.57 (1969) and to compel issuance without charge of a copy of his Selective Service file. The district court dismissed the complaint. We affirm. The Regulation provides that before indictment or a habeas corpus proceeding, a registrant or his representative may review the file at the draft board office, and receive a copy by paying one dollar per page, or $5.00 per hour for an employee to monitor the file while the registrant copies the file himself. Post-indictment or post-habeas corpus registrants receive complete copies free of charge. Appellant is not in the latter categories. We hold that 31 U.S.C. § 483a (1964 Ed.Supp. IV) does authorize such a charge and that 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1964 Ed. Supp. IV) requiring government agencies to make public information available does not change this result. *816 In light of the reasonable alternatives available to the registrant to secure the desired information, we also conclude that the fees are not arbitrary and capricious and do not deprive him of due process or equal protection. Affirmed.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to have declared invalid Selective Service System Regulation 32 C.F.R.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to have declared invalid Selective Service System Regulation 32 C.F.R.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Reinoehl v. Hershey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 8, 1970.
Use the citation No. 8896328 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →