FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8699669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Reed v. City of Tacoma

No. 8699669 · Decided May 19, 2017
No. 8699669 · Ninth Circuit · 2017 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2017
Citation
No. 8699669
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * The evidence that Officer Terwilliger’s microphone was both attached to his uniform by a cord and stuck inside Vernie Reed’s vehicle as the vehicle started to move forward is not contested. Therefore, there is no genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Officer Terwilliger’s use of force was reasonable under the circumstances, and the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Officer Terwilliger. Jackson v. City of Bremerton, 268 F.3d 646, 653 (9th Cir. 2001). As there was no constitutional violation, the City of Tacoma cannot be held liable under Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690-95 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). Therefore, the City of Tacoma was also entitled to summary judgment. Scott v. Henrich, 39 F.3d 912, 916 (9th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * The evidence that Officer Terwilliger’s microphone was both attached to his uniform by a cord and stuck inside Vernie Reed’s vehicle as the vehicle started to move forward is not contested.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * The evidence that Officer Terwilliger’s microphone was both attached to his uniform by a cord and stuck inside Vernie Reed’s vehicle as the vehicle started to move forward is not contested.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Reed v. City of Tacoma in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8699669 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →