FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8989217
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Redman v. County of San Diego

No. 8989217 · Decided July 11, 1990
No. 8989217 · Ninth Circuit · 1990 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 11, 1990
Citation
No. 8989217
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Plain English Summary
ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Redman v. County of San Diego in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 11, 1990.
Use the citation No. 8989217 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →