Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8951676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Razey v. Heckler
No. 8951676 · Decided April 1, 1986
No. 8951676·Ninth Circuit · 1986·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 1, 1986
Citation
No. 8951676
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER The panel has voted to amend its opinion filed herein on April 1,1986, 785 F.2d 1426 , by adding the following paragraph on page 1431 before “AFFIRMED”: We do not reach, and express no opinion upon, the issue of the preclusive effect of this case on any other case in which Razey may be a member of a plaintiff class, nor do we express any opinion upon the effect of such other cases upon this case. With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R.App.P. 35.) The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
Plain English Summary
ORDER The panel has voted to amend its opinion filed herein on April 1,1986, 785 F.2d 1426 , by adding the following paragraph on page 1431 before “AFFIRMED”: We do not reach, and express no opinion upon, the issue of the preclusive effect
Key Points
01ORDER The panel has voted to amend its opinion filed herein on April 1,1986, 785 F.2d 1426 , by adding the following paragraph on page 1431 before “AFFIRMED”: We do not reach, and express no opinion upon, the issue of the preclusive effect
02With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
03The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.
0435.) The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER The panel has voted to amend its opinion filed herein on April 1,1986, 785 F.2d 1426 , by adding the following paragraph on page 1431 before “AFFIRMED”: We do not reach, and express no opinion upon, the issue of the preclusive effect
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Razey v. Heckler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 1, 1986.
Use the citation No. 8951676 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.