Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8694283
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ray-Duran v. Lynch
No. 8694283 · Decided May 20, 2015
No. 8694283·Ninth Circuit · 2015·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 20, 2015
Citation
No. 8694283
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Adrian Ray-Duran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. The BIA did not err in determining that Ray-Duran waived any challenge to the IJ’s determination that Ray-Duran was subject to the heightened standard of *604 hardship for a waiver of inadmissability under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (h). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider Ray-Duran’s contentions regarding the IJ’s determination that Ray-Duran was subject to the heightened standard of hardship, because he failed to raise the issue.with the BIA and therefore failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Adrian Ray-Duran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Adrian Ray-Duran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal.
02The BIA did not err in determining that Ray-Duran waived any challenge to the IJ’s determination that Ray-Duran was subject to the heightened standard of *604 hardship for a waiver of inadmissability under 8 U.S.C.
03Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider Ray-Duran’s contentions regarding the IJ’s determination that Ray-Duran was subject to the heightened standard of hardship, because he failed to raise the issue.with the BIA and therefore failed
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Adrian Ray-Duran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ray-Duran v. Lynch in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 20, 2015.
Use the citation No. 8694283 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.