FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9008786
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Ratti v. City of San Francisco

No. 9008786 · Decided June 16, 1992
No. 9008786 · Ninth Circuit · 1992 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 16, 1992
Citation
No. 9008786
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment. Furthermore, we do not find a basis for suspending the normal operation of the one year statute of limitations. We also note without deciding that the action is probably barred in light of Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755 , 762 n. 2, 109 S.Ct. 2180 , 2184 n. 2, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989). AFFIRMED.
Plain English Summary
ORDER We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ratti v. City of San Francisco in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 16, 1992.
Use the citation No. 9008786 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →