Question 1

What did the Ninth Circuit decide in Randolph Garaux v. Reginald L. Pulley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of the San Quentin State Prison and J.W.L. Park, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Appeals Investigator for the Department of Corrections, Randolph Garaux v. Reginald Pulley?

Accepted Answer

Randolph Garaux v. Reginald L. Pulley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of the San Quentin State Prison and J.W.L. Park, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Appeals Investigator for the Department of Corrections, Randolph Garaux v. Reginald Pulley is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.

Question 2

Is Randolph Garaux v. Reginald L. Pulley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of the San Quentin State Prison and J.W.L. Park, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Appeals Investigator for the Department of Corrections, Randolph Garaux v. Reginald Pulley still good law?

Accepted Answer

FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Randolph Garaux v. Reginald L. Pulley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of the San Quentin State Prison and J.W.L. Park, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Appeals Investigator for the Department of Corrections, Randolph Garaux v. Reginald Pulley in the current circuit citation data.

Question 3

When was Randolph Garaux v. Reginald L. Pulley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of the San Quentin State Prison and J.W.L. Park, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Appeals Investigator for the Department of Corrections, Randolph Garaux v. Reginald Pulley decided?

Accepted Answer

This case was decided on August 1, 1984.

Question 4

How do I cite Randolph Garaux v. Reginald L. Pulley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of the San Quentin State Prison and J.W.L. Park, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Appeals Investigator for the Department of Corrections, Randolph Garaux v. Reginald Pulley?

Accepted Answer

Use the citation No. 438938 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.

Feature	FlawFinder	Westlaw	LexisNexis
Monthly price	$19 – $99	$133 – $646	$153 – $399
Contract	None	1–3 year min	1–6 year min
Hidden fees	$0, always	Up to $469/search	$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citator	Included	KeyCite ($$$)	Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summary	Included	No	No
Cancel	One click	Termination fees	Account friction

Randolph Garaux v. Reginald L. Pulley, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of the San Quentin State Prison and J.W.L. Park, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Appeals Investigator for the Department of Corrections, Randolph Garaux v. Reginald Pulley

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Full legal research for $19/month