FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9452624
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Ramori Rogers, Sr. v. Gallion

No. 9452624 · Decided December 15, 2023
No. 9452624 · Ninth Circuit · 2023 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 15, 2023
Citation
No. 9452624
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAMORI VAUGHN ROGERS, Sr., No. 22-15939 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00206-JAS v. MEMORANDUM* GALLION, Unknown; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 12, 2023** Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Ramori Vaughn Rogers, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging constitutional claims. We have * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1168 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment because Rogers failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable. See id. at 1172 (setting forth exhaustion framework under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”)); see also Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 643-44 (2016) (describing limited circumstances in which administrative remedies are unavailable); Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 524 (2002) (requiring PLRA exhaustion for federal prisoners’ Bivens actions). We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). All pending motions and requests are denied. AFFIRMED. 2 22-15939
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ramori Rogers, Sr. v. Gallion in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 15, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9452624 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →