Question 1

What did the Ninth Circuit decide in Ramona Loring and Lester Loring, Wife and Husband, for and on Behalf of Themselves and Approximately 200 Other Members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Similarly Situated, and Herman Grey, as Objecting Class Members v. The City of Scottsdale, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation?

Accepted Answer

Ramona Loring and Lester Loring, Wife and Husband, for and on Behalf of Themselves and Approximately 200 Other Members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Similarly Situated, and Herman Grey, as Objecting Class Members v. The City of Scottsdale, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.

Question 2

Is Ramona Loring and Lester Loring, Wife and Husband, for and on Behalf of Themselves and Approximately 200 Other Members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Similarly Situated, and Herman Grey, as Objecting Class Members v. The City of Scottsdale, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation still good law?

Accepted Answer

FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ramona Loring and Lester Loring, Wife and Husband, for and on Behalf of Themselves and Approximately 200 Other Members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Similarly Situated, and Herman Grey, as Objecting Class Members v. The City of Scottsdale, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation in the current circuit citation data.

Question 3

When was Ramona Loring and Lester Loring, Wife and Husband, for and on Behalf of Themselves and Approximately 200 Other Members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Similarly Situated, and Herman Grey, as Objecting Class Members v. The City of Scottsdale, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation decided?

Accepted Answer

This case was decided on November 30, 1983.

Question 4

How do I cite Ramona Loring and Lester Loring, Wife and Husband, for and on Behalf of Themselves and Approximately 200 Other Members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Similarly Situated, and Herman Grey, as Objecting Class Members v. The City of Scottsdale, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation?

Accepted Answer

Use the citation No. 427285 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.

Feature	FlawFinder	Westlaw	LexisNexis
Monthly price	$19 – $99	$133 – $646	$153 – $399
Contract	None	1–3 year min	1–6 year min
Hidden fees	$0, always	Up to $469/search	$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citator	Included	KeyCite ($$$)	Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summary	Included	No	No
Cancel	One click	Termination fees	Account friction

Ramona Loring and Lester Loring, Wife and Husband, for and on Behalf of Themselves and Approximately 200 Other Members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Similarly Situated, and Herman Grey, as Objecting Class Members v. The City of Scottsdale, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Full legal research for $19/month