Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623950
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ramirez v. Gonzales
No. 8623950 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623950·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623950
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Husband and wife Carlos and Marcela Ramirez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review. In their opening brief, petitioners fail to address, and therefore have waived any challenge to the BIA’s decision denying their motion to reopen based on potential eligibility for President Bush’s 2004 proposal of a temporary worker program. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Husband and wife Carlos and Marcela Ramirez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Husband and wife Carlos and Marcela Ramirez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02In their opening brief, petitioners fail to address, and therefore have waived any challenge to the BIA’s decision denying their motion to reopen based on potential eligibility for President Bush’s 2004 proposal of a temporary worker progra
03INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Husband and wife Carlos and Marcela Ramirez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ramirez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623950 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.