Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8690254
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ramirez v. Arizona Public Service Co.
No. 8690254 · Decided October 24, 2008
No. 8690254·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 24, 2008
Citation
No. 8690254
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Paul Lance Ramirez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his employment action alleging violations of Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, and various Arizona laws. We consider sua sponte whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal, Hostler v. Groves, 912 F.2d 1158, 1160 (9th Cir.1990), and we dismiss. Ramirez’s notice of appeal was untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after the district court entered judgment. See Fed. R.App. 4(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc., 476 F.3d 701, 703 (9th Cir.2007) (“A timely notice of appeal is a non-waivable jurisdictional requirement.”). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Paul Lance Ramirez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his employment action alleging violations of Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, and various Arizona laws.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Paul Lance Ramirez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his employment action alleging violations of Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, and various Arizona laws.
02We consider sua sponte whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal, Hostler v.
03Ramirez’s notice of appeal was untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after the district court entered judgment.
04Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc., 476 F.3d 701, 703 (9th Cir.2007) (“A timely notice of appeal is a non-waivable jurisdictional requirement.”).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Paul Lance Ramirez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his employment action alleging violations of Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, and various Arizona laws.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ramirez v. Arizona Public Service Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 24, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8690254 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.