Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629620
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ramirez-Quiroz v. Gonzales
No. 8629620 · Decided March 15, 2007
No. 8629620·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 15, 2007
Citation
No. 8629620
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Anastacio Ramirez-Quiroz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its prior order dismissing as untimely Ramirez-Quiroz’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Even construing his opening brief liberally, Ramirez-Quiroz fails to raise, and therefore has waived, any challenge to the BIA’s determinations that his motion to reconsider failed to establish an error of fact or law in its prior order. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (stating that issues not supported by argument are deemed abandoned). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Anastacio Ramirez-Quiroz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its prior order dismissing as untimely Ramirez-Quiroz’s
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Anastacio Ramirez-Quiroz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its prior order dismissing as untimely Ramirez-Quiroz’s
02Even construing his opening brief liberally, Ramirez-Quiroz fails to raise, and therefore has waived, any challenge to the BIA’s determinations that his motion to reconsider failed to establish an error of fact or law in its prior order.
03INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (stating that issues not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Anastacio Ramirez-Quiroz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its prior order dismissing as untimely Ramirez-Quiroz’s
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ramirez-Quiroz v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 15, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629620 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.