Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689942
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Quezada v. Hedgpeth
No. 8689942 · Decided October 15, 2008
No. 8689942·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 15, 2008
Citation
No. 8689942
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby sum *586 marily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s request for preliminary injunctive relief because the district court dismissed appellant’s complaint prior to service. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a)(1) (court may issue preliminary injunction only on notice to adverse party); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133 , 1136 (9th Cir.1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *586 ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby sum *586 marily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s request for preliminary injunctive relief because the district court dismissed a
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby sum *586 marily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s request for preliminary injunctive relief because the district court dismissed a
0265(a)(1) (court may issue preliminary injunction only on notice to adverse party); see also United States v.
03Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); WMX Techs., Inc.
04Miller, 104 F.3d 1133 , 1136 (9th Cir.1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby sum *586 marily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s request for preliminary injunctive relief because the district court dismissed a
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Quezada v. Hedgpeth in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 15, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689942 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.