FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8695420
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Qianchang Wu v. Lynch

No. 8695420 · Decided November 25, 2015
No. 8695420 · Ninth Circuit · 2015 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 25, 2015
Citation
No. 8695420
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER ** Respondent’s motion to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for administrative closure is GRANTED. As requested, the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs on appeal. This order served on the Board of Immigration Appeals shall constitute the mandate of this court. REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
ORDER ** Respondent’s motion to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for administrative closure is GRANTED.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER ** Respondent’s motion to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for administrative closure is GRANTED.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Qianchang Wu v. Lynch in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 25, 2015.
Use the citation No. 8695420 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →