FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 729784
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, and Southern California Utility Power Pool Imperial Irrigation District Meridian Oil Inc. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Southern California Gas Company Process Gas Consumers Group Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. Kern River Gas Transmission Company Associated Gas Distributors Toward Utility Rate Normalization San Diego Gas and Electric Company National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners City and County of San Francisco, Petitioners-Intervenors, and New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department, Participant-Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Mojave Pipeline Company, Respondent-Intervenor. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and El Paso Natural Gas Company Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. City and County of San Francisco, Petitioners-Intervenors, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Meridian Oil Inc. Process Gas Consumers Group Mojave Pipeline Company, Respondents-Intervenors. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

No. 729784 · Decided November 20, 1996
No. 729784 · Ninth Circuit · 1996 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 20, 1996
Citation
No. 729784
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, and Southern California Utility Power Pool Imperial Irrigation District Meridian Oil Inc. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Southern California Gas Company Process Gas Consumers Group Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. Kern River Gas Transmission Company Associated Gas Distributors Toward Utility Rate Normalization San Diego Gas and Electric Company National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners City and County of San Francisco, Petitioners-Intervenors, and New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department, Participant-Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Mojave Pipeline Company, Respondent-Intervenor. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and El Paso Natural Gas Company Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. City and County of San Francisco, Petitioners-Intervenors, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Meridian Oil Inc. Process Gas Consumers Group Mojave Pipeline Company, Respondents-Intervenors. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, and Southern California Utility Power Pool Imperial Irrigation District Meridian Oil Inc. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Southern California Gas Company Process Gas Consumers Group Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. Kern River Gas Transmission Company Associated Gas Distributors Toward Utility Rate Normalization San Diego Gas and Electric Company National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners City and County of San Francisco, Petitioners-Intervenors, and New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department, Participant-Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Mojave Pipeline Company, Respondent-Intervenor. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and El Paso Natural Gas Company Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. City and County of San Francisco, Petitioners-Intervenors, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Meridian Oil Inc. Process Gas Consumers Group Mojave Pipeline Company, Respondents-Intervenors. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 20, 1996.
Use the citation No. 729784 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →