Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8916505
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland
No. 8916505 · Decided March 20, 1978
No. 8916505·Ninth Circuit · 1978·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 20, 1978
Citation
No. 8916505
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v. Butz, N.D.Cal., 1975, 444 F.Supp. 785 . We add only that the judge did, on motion for new trial, consider appellants’ “Corrected Exhibit C.” As to that exhibit, he said: [S]o far as the newly discovered evidence goes, I think it’s inconsequential, at best, the changes in the figures — and irrelevant at the least. (R.T. 198.) He was right. Affirmed.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v.
Key Points
01PER CURIAM: The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v.
02We add only that the judge did, on motion for new trial, consider appellants’ “Corrected Exhibit C.” As to that exhibit, he said: [S]o far as the newly discovered evidence goes, I think it’s inconsequential, at best, the changes in the figu
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 20, 1978.
Use the citation No. 8916505 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.