FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630038
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Portnoy v. United States

No. 8630038 · Decided April 9, 2007
No. 8630038 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 9, 2007
Citation
No. 8630038
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Portnoy v. United States in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 9, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630038 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →