Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8815848
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Pitt v. Rodgers
No. 8815848 · Decided July 24, 1916
No. 8815848·Ninth Circuit · 1916·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 24, 1916
Citation
No. 8815848
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Nevada. Morrison, Dunno & Brobeck and Edward Hohfeld, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Upon application of counsel for appellee, and on consideration ol' certificate of clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, ordered, appeal dismissed for noncompliance by the appellants with provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice ( 150 Fed. cxxvii ).
Plain English Summary
Morrison, Dunno & Brobeck and Edward Hohfeld, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Key Points
01Morrison, Dunno & Brobeck and Edward Hohfeld, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
02Upon application of counsel for appellee, and on consideration ol' certificate of clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, ordered, appeal dismissed for noncompliance by the appellants with provisions of subdivision 1
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Morrison, Dunno & Brobeck and Edward Hohfeld, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Pitt v. Rodgers in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 24, 1916.
Use the citation No. 8815848 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.