FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9433367
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. Felicia Ponce

No. 9433367 · Decided October 17, 2023
No. 9433367 · Ninth Circuit · 2023 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 17, 2023
Citation
No. 9433367
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 17 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO, No. 21-55877 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00072-ODW-JDE v. MEMORANDUM * FELICIA PONCE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 10, 2023** Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Appellee’s motion to lift the stay in these proceedings is granted. The stay of this action, entered on November 22, 2022, is lifted. Federal prisoner Phillip Camillo-Amisano appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Pinson v. Carvajal, 69 F.4th 1059, 1063 (9th Cir. 2023), we affirm. Camillo-Amisano contends that the district court erred by concluding that his claim regarding the conditions of his confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic was not cognizable in a § 2241 habeas petition. Contrary to Camillo- Amisano’s contention, the fact that he was seeking immediate release is insufficient to invoke habeas jurisdiction. See id. at 1072-73 (“[A] successful claim sounding in habeas necessarily results in release, but a claim seeking release does not necessarily sound in habeas.”). Rather, Camillo-Amisano needed to show that his detention is without legal authorization. See id. at 1070. Because he failed to do so, the district court properly dismissed his petition. See id. at 1073-75 (holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction over a § 2241 petition seeking release on the basis of prison conditions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic). The record demonstrates that the Department of Justice received and denied Camillo-Amisano’s request to be transferred to Canada, contradicting his contention that prison officials intentionally interfered with his transfer request by taking no action on it. AFFIRMED. 2 21-55877
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 17 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 17 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. Felicia Ponce in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 17, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9433367 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →