Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Perez v. Gonzales
No. 8644011 · Decided September 13, 2007
No. 8644011·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 13, 2007
Citation
No. 8644011
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying petitioner’s motion to reopen immigration proceedings. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Specifically, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied petitioner’s motion to reopen as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2); Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that BIA denials of motions to reopen or reconsider are reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying petitioner’s motion to reopen immigration proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying petitioner’s motion to reopen immigration proceedings.
02Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
04Specifically, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied petitioner’s motion to reopen as numerically barred.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying petitioner’s motion to reopen immigration proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Perez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 13, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644011 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.