Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647499
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Perez-Torres v. Mukasey
No. 8647499 · Decided January 4, 2008
No. 8647499·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 4, 2008
Citation
No. 8647499
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Miguel Perez-Torres petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary determination that he failed to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely *515 unusual hardship” requirement for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). We have explicitly held that this court lacks jurisdiction to review a discretionary hardship determination under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i). Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir.2003). Petitioner fails to raise any credible argument that would require us to resolve the question we left open in Romero-Torres. See Id. at 891 n. 5. We DISMISS the petition for lack of jurisdiction. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Miguel Perez-Torres petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary determination that he failed to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely *515 unusual hardship” requirement for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM * Miguel Perez-Torres petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary determination that he failed to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely *515 unusual hardship” requirement for cancellation of removal.
02We have explicitly held that this court lacks jurisdiction to review a discretionary hardship determination under 8 U.S.C.
03Petitioner fails to raise any credible argument that would require us to resolve the question we left open in Romero-Torres.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Miguel Perez-Torres petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary determination that he failed to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely *515 unusual hardship” requirement for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Perez-Torres v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 4, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8647499 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.