Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626484
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Pelico v. Gonzales
No. 8626484 · Decided December 1, 2006
No. 8626484·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8626484
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is denied. A review of the record indicates that this petition for review is appropriate for summary disposition because the questions raised are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 698 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, we sua sponte deny this petition for review. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is denied.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is denied.
02A review of the record indicates that this petition for review is appropriate for summary disposition because the questions raised are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v.
04Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is denied.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Pelico v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626484 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.