Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625795
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Pedraza v. Gonzales
No. 8625795 · Decided November 13, 2006
No. 8625795·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 13, 2006
Citation
No. 8625795
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Austria Pedraza, a native and citizens of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. Austria Pedraza contends the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service violated his due process and equal protection rights by placing him in removal, rather than deportation, proceedings. However, Austria Pedraza has not demonstrated that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion to reopen. See Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.2005); see also Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that being placed in removal proceedings rather than deportation proceedings does not violate the U.S. Constitution). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Austria Pedraza, a native and citizens of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Austria Pedraza, a native and citizens of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen.
02Austria Pedraza contends the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service violated his due process and equal protection rights by placing him in removal, rather than deportation, proceedings.
03However, Austria Pedraza has not demonstrated that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion to reopen.
04Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.2005); see also Vasquez-Zavala v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Austria Pedraza, a native and citizens of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Pedraza v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 13, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625795 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.