Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644053
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
P.J. ex rel. Jakubiak v. Pomona Unified School District
No. 8644053 · Decided August 14, 2007
No. 8644053·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 14, 2007
Citation
No. 8644053
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Appellant P.J., a minor represented by his guardians ad litem, Denise and Matthew Jakubiak, challenges the district court’s judgment in favor of the Pomona Unified School District (District) and the California Special Education Hearing Office (SEHO). 1. P.J. had notice of the hearing. PJ.’s parents acknowledged receiving the hearing notice, which advised them that the hearing would be continued from day-to-day until completed. 2. Denial of P.J.’s request for a continuance based on his counsel’s scheduling conflicts did not violate due process. The student’s parents waited until a week prior to the hearing to retain an attorney who was unable to attend the hearing due to scheduling conflicts. Neither Cal. Educ.Code § 56507(a) nor 34 C.F.R. § 300.511 govern this case, as they only address potential bases for a continuance. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Appellant P.J., a minor represented by his guardians ad litem, Denise and Matthew Jakubiak, challenges the district court’s judgment in favor of the Pomona Unified School District (District) and the California Special Educati
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Appellant P.J., a minor represented by his guardians ad litem, Denise and Matthew Jakubiak, challenges the district court’s judgment in favor of the Pomona Unified School District (District) and the California Special Educati
02PJ.’s parents acknowledged receiving the hearing notice, which advised them that the hearing would be continued from day-to-day until completed.
03Denial of P.J.’s request for a continuance based on his counsel’s scheduling conflicts did not violate due process.
04The student’s parents waited until a week prior to the hearing to retain an attorney who was unable to attend the hearing due to scheduling conflicts.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Appellant P.J., a minor represented by his guardians ad litem, Denise and Matthew Jakubiak, challenges the district court’s judgment in favor of the Pomona Unified School District (District) and the California Special Educati
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for P.J. ex rel. Jakubiak v. Pomona Unified School District in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 14, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644053 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.