Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8814208
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Osterman v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.
No. 8814208 · Decided March 28, 1916
No. 8814208·Ninth Circuit · 1916·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 28, 1916
Citation
No. 8814208
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana. L. O. Evans, of Kulte, Mont., W. B. Rodgers, of Anaconda, Mont., and D. Gay Stivers, of Butte, Mont., for defendant in error. On motion of counsel for defendant in error, writ of error dismissed for the noneompliance by the plaintiff in error with the pro visions.of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules of practice of this court ( 150 Fed. xxix , 79 C. C. A. xxix ); the plaintiff in error having foiled to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by said rule.
Plain English Summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana.
Key Points
01In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana.
02On motion of counsel for defendant in error, writ of error dismissed for the noneompliance by the plaintiff in error with the pro visions.of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules of practice of this court ( 150 Fed.
03xxix ); the plaintiff in error having foiled to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by said rule.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Osterman v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 28, 1916.
Use the citation No. 8814208 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.