Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628090
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Osorio v. Gonzales
No. 8628090 · Decided January 18, 2007
No. 8628090·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 18, 2007
Citation
No. 8628090
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioners’ motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ third motion to reconsider as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2); Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioners’ motion for a stay of voluntary departure is denied. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that this court lacks authority to grant a stay of voluntary departure if the stay motion is filed after the voluntary departure period expired). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioners’ motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioners’ motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal.
02The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ third motion to reconsider as numerically barred.
03Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider is reviewed for abuse of discretion).
04Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioners’ motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Osorio v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 18, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628090 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.