Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625786
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ortiz v. Gonzales
No. 8625786 · Decided November 9, 2006
No. 8625786·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 9, 2006
Citation
No. 8625786
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Olea-Ortiz and Mariam Bail-on-Martinez, natives and citizens of Mexico and husband and wife, petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ challenge to the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Olea-Ortiz and Mariam Bail-on-Martinez, natives and citizens of Mexico and husband and wife, petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the immigration judge’s
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Olea-Ortiz and Mariam Bail-on-Martinez, natives and citizens of Mexico and husband and wife, petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the immigration judge’s
02We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ challenge to the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their qualifying relatives.
03Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Olea-Ortiz and Mariam Bail-on-Martinez, natives and citizens of Mexico and husband and wife, petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the immigration judge’s
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ortiz v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 9, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625786 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.