Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647578
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Orozco v. Mukasey
No. 8647578 · Decided February 13, 2008
No. 8647578·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 13, 2008
Citation
No. 8647578
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The record doesn’t compel a finding of past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13 (b). One rock-throwing incident that didn’t harm petitioner and phone calls containing vague threats do not amount to persecution, which is “an extreme concept, marked by the infliction of suffering or harm ... in a way regarded as offensive.” Li v. Ashcroft, 356 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir.2004) (en banc). The IJ therefore properly denied petitioner asylum. Consequently, petitioner is also necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). Petitioner’s claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture also fails because a reasonable adjudicator wouldn’t be compelled to find it more likely than not that petitioner would be tortured if removed. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16 (c)(2). PETITION DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The record doesn’t compel a finding of past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The record doesn’t compel a finding of past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.
02One rock-throwing incident that didn’t harm petitioner and phone calls containing vague threats do not amount to persecution, which is “an extreme concept, marked by the infliction of suffering or harm ...
03Consequently, petitioner is also necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal.
04Petitioner’s claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture also fails because a reasonable adjudicator wouldn’t be compelled to find it more likely than not that petitioner would be tortured if removed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The record doesn’t compel a finding of past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Orozco v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 13, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8647578 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.