Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8986741
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Lyng
No. 8986741 · Decided April 19, 1990
No. 8986741·Ninth Circuit · 1990·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 19, 1990
Citation
No. 8986741
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER In his petition for rehearing, the Secretary contends that he was not given an adequate opportunity to be heard on the issue of attorneys’ fees. We agree. Accordingly, the opinion is amended by deleting Section IV entitled “Attorneys’ Fees," 882 F.2d 1417 at pages 1427-28 and replacing it with the following: ONRC seeks attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act for both the underlying district court action and for the appeal. Pursuant to Circuit Rule 39-1.8, consideration of all such fee matters is ordered transferred for a determination de novo to the district court. At page 1428, the fourth sentence of the CONCLUSION starting with “On remand, the district court....” is ordered deleted from the opinion. With the opinion so amended, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing filed by both parties. Both are denied. SO ORDERED.
Plain English Summary
ORDER In his petition for rehearing, the Secretary contends that he was not given an adequate opportunity to be heard on the issue of attorneys’ fees.
Key Points
01ORDER In his petition for rehearing, the Secretary contends that he was not given an adequate opportunity to be heard on the issue of attorneys’ fees.
02Accordingly, the opinion is amended by deleting Section IV entitled “Attorneys’ Fees," 882 F.2d 1417 at pages 1427-28 and replacing it with the following: ONRC seeks attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act for both the underly
03Pursuant to Circuit Rule 39-1.8, consideration of all such fee matters is ordered transferred for a determination de novo to the district court.
04At page 1428, the fourth sentence of the CONCLUSION starting with “On remand, the district court....” is ordered deleted from the opinion.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER In his petition for rehearing, the Secretary contends that he was not given an adequate opportunity to be heard on the issue of attorneys’ fees.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Lyng in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 19, 1990.
Use the citation No. 8986741 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.