Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8631150
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ordonez v. Gonzales
No. 8631150 · Decided May 14, 2007
No. 8631150·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 14, 2007
Citation
No. 8631150
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*741 MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying petitioner’s fourth motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and petitioner’s filings in this court, including petitioner’s response to this court’s order to show cause. Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because petitioner’s fourth motion to reopen violated both the numerical and time limitations on motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2). A party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings and that motion must be filed within 90 days after the date on which a final administrative decision was filed. Id. Therefore, this petition for review is denied. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard for summary disposition). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*741 MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying petitioner’s fourth motion to reopen.
Key Points
01*741 MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying petitioner’s fourth motion to reopen.
02We have reviewed the record and petitioner’s filings in this court, including petitioner’s response to this court’s order to show cause.
03Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because petitioner’s fourth motion to reopen violated both the numerical and time limitations on motions to reopen.
04A party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings and that motion must be filed within 90 days after the date on which a final administrative decision was filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
*741 MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying petitioner’s fourth motion to reopen.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ordonez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 14, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8631150 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.