Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8660795
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Olvera-Frias v. Mukasey
No. 8660795 · Decided March 27, 2008
No. 8660795·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 27, 2008
Citation
No. 8660795
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Olvera-Frias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying him relief under former 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. *588 § 1252 . Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review. The record does not compel the conclusion that Olvera-Frias met his burden of proving unrelinquished domicile. See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that a contrary result is not compelled where there is “[t]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Olvera-Frias’ due process contention is unpersuasive. We note that the BIA did not use its affirmance without opinion procedure in this case. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Olvera-Frias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying him relief under former 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jose Olvera-Frias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying him relief under former 8 U.S.C.
02The record does not compel the conclusion that Olvera-Frias met his burden of proving unrelinquished domicile.
03INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that a contrary result is not compelled where there is “[t]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
04We note that the BIA did not use its affirmance without opinion procedure in this case.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Olvera-Frias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying him relief under former 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Olvera-Frias v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 27, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8660795 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.