Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627526
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ochoa v. Gonzales
No. 8627526 · Decided December 27, 2006
No. 8627526·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 27, 2006
Citation
No. 8627526
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Rosalva Loeza Ochoa and Jose Ronny Molina Loeza, natives and citizens of Mexi *687 co, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen, because the news articles attached to the motion were not material to petitioners’ claims for relief. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(1). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *687 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Rosalva Loeza Ochoa and Jose Ronny Molina Loeza, natives and citizens of Mexi *687 co, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Rosalva Loeza Ochoa and Jose Ronny Molina Loeza, natives and citizens of Mexi *687 co, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen, because the news articles attached to the motion were not material to petitioners’ claims for relief.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *687 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Rosalva Loeza Ochoa and Jose Ronny Molina Loeza, natives and citizens of Mexi *687 co, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ochoa v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 27, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627526 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.