Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642757
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ocampo v. Gonzales
No. 8642757 · Decided June 15, 2007
No. 8642757·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 15, 2007
Citation
No. 8642757
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ocampo seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying Ocampo’s application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). We do not consider Ocampo’s contention regarding physical presence because his failure to establish hardship is dispositive. We are not persuaded that Ocampo’s removal results in the deprivation of his children’s rights. See Cabrera-Alvarez v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 1006, 1012-13 (9th Cir.2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *250 ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ocampo seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying Ocampo’s application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ocampo seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying Ocampo’s application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative.
03We do not consider Ocampo’s contention regarding physical presence because his failure to establish hardship is dispositive.
04We are not persuaded that Ocampo’s removal results in the deprivation of his children’s rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Ocampo seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying Ocampo’s application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ocampo v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 15, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642757 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.