Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9343697
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
O'Reilly v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 9343697 · Decided January 17, 1975
No. 9343697·Ninth Circuit · 1975·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 17, 1975
Citation
No. 9343697
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
OPINION PER CURIAM: The Supreme Court vacated the judgments in these cases and remanded them for reconsideration in light of N.L.R.B. v. Boeing Company, 412 U.S. 67 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 752 (1973). Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 504 v. O’Reilly, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S.Ct. 36 , 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973). In No. 71 — 1853, we continue to adhere to those portions of our opinion, reported at 472 F.2d 416 (9th Cir. 1972), holding that the Board properly defined the issues before it and that the “no-strike” provision of the collective bargaining agreement had no application to the honoring of a sister union’s lawful picket line. As for the other issue in the case, the Supreme Court has settled that it is *429 not within the purview of the Board’s responsibility to review the reasonableness of disciplinary fines imposed by unions upon their members. N.L.R.B. v. Boeing Company, supra. Accordingly, the petition to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied. In No. 26,892, the single issue presented is that which is now concluded by Boeing. Therefore, the petition to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied.
Plain English Summary
OPINION PER CURIAM: The Supreme Court vacated the judgments in these cases and remanded them for reconsideration in light of N.L.R.B.
Key Points
01OPINION PER CURIAM: The Supreme Court vacated the judgments in these cases and remanded them for reconsideration in light of N.L.R.B.
0271 — 1853, we continue to adhere to those portions of our opinion, reported at 472 F.2d 416 (9th Cir.
031972), holding that the Board properly defined the issues before it and that the “no-strike” provision of the collective bargaining agreement had no application to the honoring of a sister union’s lawful picket line.
04As for the other issue in the case, the Supreme Court has settled that it is *429 not within the purview of the Board’s responsibility to review the reasonableness of disciplinary fines imposed by unions upon their members.
Frequently Asked Questions
OPINION PER CURIAM: The Supreme Court vacated the judgments in these cases and remanded them for reconsideration in light of N.L.R.B.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for O'Reilly v. National Labor Relations Board in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 17, 1975.
Use the citation No. 9343697 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.