Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8892218
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
O'Hara v. California
No. 8892218 · Decided February 15, 1968
No. 8892218·Ninth Circuit · 1968·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 15, 1968
Citation
No. 8892218
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: The appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 .
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: The appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01PER CURIAM: The appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: The appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for O'Hara v. California in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 15, 1968.
Use the citation No. 8892218 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.