Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622216
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Northern Plains Resource Council v. WBI Holdings
No. 8622216 · Decided June 19, 2006
No. 8622216·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8622216
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Northern Plains Resource Council appeals the district court’s imposition, under its inherent powers, of sanctions in the amount of $2,209.50. We vacate the order imposing sanctions. The district court failed to make a specific finding that Northern Plains acted in bad faith in failing to comply completely with the terms of two protective orders. A specific finding of bad faith is required to support a court’s imposition of sanctions pursuant to its inherent powers. See Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 767 , 100 S.Ct. 2455 , 65 L.Ed.2d 488 (1980); United States v. Stoneberger, 805 F.2d 1391, 1393 (9th Cir.1986). Further, there is no evidence in the record that Northern Plains acted in bad faith; “bad faith” requires that the conduct be willful or reckless with an improper motive. See Fink v. Gomez, 239 F.3d 989, 993-94 (9th Cir .2001). Accordingly, the order imposing sanctions is VACATED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Northern Plains Resource Council appeals the district court’s imposition, under its inherent powers, of sanctions in the amount of $2,209.50.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Northern Plains Resource Council appeals the district court’s imposition, under its inherent powers, of sanctions in the amount of $2,209.50.
02The district court failed to make a specific finding that Northern Plains acted in bad faith in failing to comply completely with the terms of two protective orders.
03A specific finding of bad faith is required to support a court’s imposition of sanctions pursuant to its inherent powers.
04Further, there is no evidence in the record that Northern Plains acted in bad faith; “bad faith” requires that the conduct be willful or reckless with an improper motive.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Northern Plains Resource Council appeals the district court’s imposition, under its inherent powers, of sanctions in the amount of $2,209.50.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Northern Plains Resource Council v. WBI Holdings in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622216 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.