FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 659800
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America v. Renee Lynn White, AKA Renee Lynn Vickery, United States of America v. Robert Vickery, United States of America v. Mark Douglas Pirtle

No. 659800 · Decided December 9, 1993
No. 659800 · Ninth Circuit · 1993 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 9, 1993
Citation
No. 659800
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America v. Renee Lynn White, AKA Renee Lynn Vickery, United States of America v. Robert Vickery, United States of America v. Mark Douglas Pirtle is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America v. Renee Lynn White, AKA Renee Lynn Vickery, United States of America v. Robert Vickery, United States of America v. Mark Douglas Pirtle in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 9, 1993.
Use the citation No. 659800 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →