Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8893297
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
National Labor Relations Board v. Western Building Maintenance Co.
No. 8893297 · Decided October 24, 1968
No. 8893297·Ninth Circuit · 1968·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 24, 1968
Citation
No. 8893297
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: Upon the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that the Company and the Union jointly engaged in a hiring procedure whereby job applicants and newly hired employees were required to execute Union membership applications and dues checkoff authorizations prior to the expiration of the first 30 days of their employment. The Board was not in error in concluding that by such conduct the Company and the Union violated section 8(a) (1), (2) and (3), and section 8(b) (2) and (1) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act, respectively, and the Company unlawfully assisted the Union in violation of section 8(a) (2) and (1) of the Act. NLRB v. Campbell Soup Company, 378 F.2d 259 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 900 , 88 S.Ct. 220 , 19 L.Ed.2d 217 (1967). The Board order is entitled to enforcement.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: Upon the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that the Company and the Union jointly engaged in a hiring procedure whereby job applicants and newly hired employees were required to exec
Key Points
01PER CURIAM: Upon the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that the Company and the Union jointly engaged in a hiring procedure whereby job applicants and newly hired employees were required to exec
02The Board was not in error in concluding that by such conduct the Company and the Union violated section 8(a) (1), (2) and (3), and section 8(b) (2) and (1) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act, respectively, and the Company unlawfully a
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: Upon the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that the Company and the Union jointly engaged in a hiring procedure whereby job applicants and newly hired employees were required to exec
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for National Labor Relations Board v. Western Building Maintenance Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 24, 1968.
Use the citation No. 8893297 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.