FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 351539
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Nathan S. Jacobson v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Political Subdivision of the States of Nevada and California, the State of Nevada, and the County of Washoe, Melvin F. Jones, Verona M. Jones, His Wife, Leo D. Wyrsch, Cora E. Wyrsch, His Wife, Paul W. Gould, Lola E. Gould, His Wife, Joseph Trinchero, Delores G. Trinchero, His Wife, Paul Williams and Lanai Corporation, a California Corporation v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (t.r.p.a.), a Political Subdivision of the States of Nevada and California, California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, the State of California, Placer County and El Dorado County, Lake Country Estates, Inc., a Corporation, and Country Club Estates, a Partnership v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, County of El Dorado, State of California, Layton-Tahoe Properties v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, State of California, State of Nevada, County of Placer, United States of America

No. 351539 · Decided January 30, 1978
No. 351539 · Ninth Circuit · 1978 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 30, 1978
Citation
No. 351539
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Nathan S. Jacobson v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Political Subdivision of the States of Nevada and California, the State of Nevada, and the County of Washoe, Melvin F. Jones, Verona M. Jones, His Wife, Leo D. Wyrsch, Cora E. Wyrsch, His Wife, Paul W. Gould, Lola E. Gould, His Wife, Joseph Trinchero, Delores G. Trinchero, His Wife, Paul Williams and Lanai Corporation, a California Corporation v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (t.r.p.a.), a Political Subdivision of the States of Nevada and California, California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, the State of California, Placer County and El Dorado County, Lake Country Estates, Inc., a Corporation, and Country Club Estates, a Partnership v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, County of El Dorado, State of California, Layton-Tahoe Properties v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, State of California, State of Nevada, County of Placer, United States of America is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Nathan S. Jacobson v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Political Subdivision of the States of Nevada and California, the State of Nevada, and the County of Washoe, Melvin F. Jones, Verona M. Jones, His Wife, Leo D. Wyrsch, Cora E. Wyrsch, His Wife, Paul W. Gould, Lola E. Gould, His Wife, Joseph Trinchero, Delores G. Trinchero, His Wife, Paul Williams and Lanai Corporation, a California Corporation v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (t.r.p.a.), a Political Subdivision of the States of Nevada and California, California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, the State of California, Placer County and El Dorado County, Lake Country Estates, Inc., a Corporation, and Country Club Estates, a Partnership v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, County of El Dorado, State of California, Layton-Tahoe Properties v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, State of California, State of Nevada, County of Placer, United States of America in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 30, 1978.
Use the citation No. 351539 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →