FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9022990
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Naruto v. Slater

No. 9022990 · Decided August 31, 2018
No. 9022990 · Ninth Circuit · 2018 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 31, 2018
Citation
No. 9022990
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
A judge of the court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc. A vote was taken, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of *1149 en banc consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Plain English Summary
A judge of the court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
A judge of the court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Naruto v. Slater in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 31, 2018.
Use the citation No. 9022990 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →